The Ministry of Public Service has come out to correct what it describes as ‘inaccurate and misleading’ reporting concerning Mr Solomon Kalu and the position of Director-General of the Solomon Islands Independent Commission Against Corruption (SIICAC).
No Appointment Was Ever Made
The Ministry clarifies that Mr Kalu was never appointed to the position of Director-General of SIICAC.
Accordingly, there was no rejection of an appointment, as has been widely and incorrectly reported.
While Mr Kalu was recommended by an interview panel, the Judicial and Legal Service Commission (JLSC) ultimately determined that he should not have been shortlisted or considered for appointment.
The process therefore concluded before any appointment arose.
Decision of the Judicial and Legal Service Commission
The JLSC is an independent constitutional commission established under Section 117 of the Constitution of Solomon Islands and exercises its powers under Section 118 of the Constitution.
Following its deliberations, the Commission formed the view that, in light of relevant considerations, Mr Kalu was unsuitable for appointment as a public officer, and that the post should be re-advertised. This was a collective decision of the JLSC, made independently and based on its own assessment.
Role of the Attorney-General Properly Explained
Public commentary has incorrectly suggested that the Attorney-General rejected or directed the outcome of the JLSC process. This is factually and constitutionally incorrect.
While Mr Kalu was recommended by an interview panel, the JLSC determined that he should not have been shortlisted or considered for appointment, and the process therefore concluded before any appointment arose.
The Attorney-General did not make, direct, or influence that decision, nor did he advise that Mr Kalu be removed from the shortlisting.
His role was limited to providing legal advice on whether past conduct was a relevant consideration—advice originally sought during a separate Leadership Code Commission selection process and later treated as relevant by the JLSC in its own deliberations.
That advice was advisory only, formed part of the material available to decision-makers, and did not bind the Commission or determine the outcome. The final decision rested solely with the JLSC.
Integrity of Constitutional Processes
The Ministry emphasises that constitutional commissions operate free from political or ministerial control. Their decisions are made on merit, in accordance with the law, and are not directed by any individual member, including the Attorney-General.
Mis-characterising lawful advisory processes as personal or political decisions risks undermining public confidence in constitutional governance.
Call for Responsible Reporting
The Ministry is concerned that inaccurate and incomplete reporting has led to unwarranted personal attacks against the Attorney-General.
Such commentary risks undermining public confidence in constitutional governance and the independence of national institutions.
The Ministry urges media organisations and commentators to report responsibly and accurately on matters involving constitutional bodies and public office holders.
– Ministry of Public Service
